Which of the natural gas-fired hot stoves or coal-fired steam hot stoves has a better cost-effective and more cost-effective? Customers who have used gas-fired steam stoves and coal-fired steam stoves will know that the thermal efficiency of coal-fired hot stoves on weekdays is only 75% Your Excellency, while the thermal efficiency of gas-fired hot stoves is 95% Your Excellency. If you plan to use the amount of steam generated, the large card necessary for a ton of steam generated by coal-fired hot stoves is 1.29 times that of gas-fired hot stoves. Considering only the cost of fuel, the current market price (1000 yuan per ton of coal and 3 yuan per cubic meter of natural gas) is still comparable to that of coal-fired stoves. Fuel cost is only 75% of that of gas-fired stoves. So which one of the gas steam hot stoves or coal-fired steam hot stoves is more economical? Upper Jieyuan hot blast stove from the following aspects to discuss which hot blast stove doubled cost-effective? 第一个：首先是贩卖的本钱价钱 因为燃气蒸气热风炉在技巧和配套辅机上显著优先于燃煤蒸气热风炉，而且配有公用的燃气燃烧机，不说其余，单此一个燃烧机的价钱就把这个装备本钱给拉开了。一般来说：异样吨位的蒸气热风炉，燃气汽锅要比燃煤热风炉价钱高上约25%阁下，如许看来燃气蒸气热风炉的价钱是要比燃煤热风炉略高些。
The first one is the cost of selling because the gas steam hot stove is superior to the coal-fired steam hot stove in terms of skills and auxiliary equipment, and it is equipped with a common gas burner, not to mention the rest, the cost of this equipment is pulled aside by the price of a single burner. Generally speaking, the price of gas-fired hot-blast stove is about 25% higher than that of coal-fired hot-blast stove, so it seems that the price of gas-fired hot-blast stove is slightly higher than that of coal-fired hot-blast stove.
Secondly, the cost of equipment arrangement of hot blast stove is mainly the capital investment of hot blast stove house and steam hot blast stove pipeline. Gas steam hot blast stove is fully automatic control, because the response auxiliary equipment is more, and has automatic alarm, automatic protection and yield. When connected to the natural gas pipeline, the burner will automatically supply gas, which can effectively squander the cost of personnel. Coal-fired steam hot-blast stove because of the need for coal and other manual work order, in order to invest more capital in personnel wages, while coal-fired steam hot-blast stove in hot-blast stove room to create more funds. So the cost of coal-fired steam stove is slightly higher.
Thirdly, we should consider the cost of fuel. According to the survey, coal-fired hot stoves will be more popular in some less prosperous areas because of the small proportion of one-time investment in coal-fired steam cookers, and the huge control of coal-fired hot stoves themselves. But in some comparatively vigorous areas, people's thinking will be different. The consumption of coal-fired hot blast stoves will also lead to net pollution of the environment, such as waste residue, waste gas and waste water, which will bring persecution to people's long-term livelihood. The gas hot blast stove has the advantages of small floor area and less emission pollution, and the cost of setting up the hot blast stove room is not the highest. After the use of natural gas, the fuel price decreases and the operating cost is lower than that of oil-fired hot blast stove. This comparison depends on the growth level of the region, and others are necessary.
Summary: The above three main insights are only for people's reference. Everyone will know something about the market after reading them. Which is good or bad can only be decided according to the investment hope of the current customers and the detailed environment of the present customers.